Sport and Politics in the Twenty-First Century

In this article, we address the aporia(s) of Olympic discourse produced by troubled split between sport and politics. To start our argument, will show that sporting governing bodies continuously insist they are still on other side any kind Guided Aristotle, who presented reciprocity ethics politics, unveil fallacy discourse. a short genealogy relationship sport, ethics, highlight Munich Olympics 1936 Mexico 1968, where political engagement was exposed clearly. At same time, supposed neutrality manifested an aristocratic preference for radical right regimes. After that, analyse contemporary relation politics in light recent developments, including sport’s ambiguous reaction Ukraine war. Further argument be in- external supported inherited mantra is more than just hypocrisy. start, modern claims autonomy governance to keep away from state domination, yet very also freezes ethical core, forbidding athletes, coaches others active express engagement, passive acceptance regulation bodies, as only respected without deliberation. final part alternative understanding dynamics included philosophy fully developed following articles.